AGARO ERP · FINANCE
Numbers the engine calculates,
not numbers someone typed.
Invoices, payments, expenses, income, bank import, vendor bills, taxes, and reports on one deterministic finance engine. Totals, tax, numbering, and journals are calculated by Agaro, never typed by hand.
Talk to us New
Invoices
Billable claims and their status.
Import Export New invoice
Total invoiced
$184,320.00
Year to date · 42 invoices
Outstanding
$28,750.00
14 open · net 30
Overdue
$6,400.00
3 invoices past due
Collection rate
94.2%
Paid within terms
All42Draft4Sent11Partially paid3Paid21Overdue3
| Invoice | Customer | Issued | Due | Status | Total | Amount due | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INV-2026-0418 | Acme Corp Implementation package | Sep 6, 2026 | Oct 6, 2026 | Sent | $12,000.00 | $12,000.00 | |
| INV-2026-0417 | Northwind Traders Monthly retainer | Aug 28, 2026 | Sep 27, 2026 | Overdue | $4,850.00 | $4,850.00 | |
| INV-2026-0416 | Bluebird Studio Brand system · phase 2 | Aug 21, 2026 | Sep 20, 2026 | Partially paid | $2,300.00 | $1,150.00 | |
| INV-2026-0415 | Harbor Logistics Warehouse rollout | Aug 14, 2026 | Sep 13, 2026 | Draft | $9,600.00 | $9,600.00 | |
| INV-2026-0414 | Acme Corp Training day | Aug 7, 2026 | Sep 6, 2026 | Paid | $1,800.00 | $0.00 | |
| INV-2026-0413 | Summit Dental Annual subscription | Aug 1, 2026 | Aug 31, 2026 | Paid | $3,480.00 | $0.00 | |
| INV-2026-0412 | Northwind Traders Data migration | Jul 30, 2026 | Aug 29, 2026 | Paid | $6,200.00 | $0.00 | |
| INV-2026-0411 | Riverside Clinic Front desk kiosk | Jul 24, 2026 | Aug 23, 2026 | Overdue | $1,550.00 | $1,550.00 |
Rows per page 25 1–8 of 42
Finance · Acme Industries Assistant · confirm to send
Draft
Confirm
Requests today · 12 September 2026
Yusuf G. Reviewing…
Capabilities
What this module actually does inside Agaro ERP.
01
Invoices with allocated numbers
Ask for an invoice and the engine resolves the customer, the catalog item, the stored price, the workspace currency, tax, and payment terms — then allocates the number and commits the journal.
02
Payments against the same records
Payments, recurring revenue, and AR/AP aging read the invoices they belong to. A receipt applied here changes the report there without a second entry.
03
Expenses and income
Expense capture, approval, posting, and reimbursement run as one workflow with categories, cards, and analysis. Income entries land in the ledger the reports already read.
04
Bank import and reconciliation
Bank feed import, reconciliation models, internal transfers, and loans matched against entries the workspace already holds, instead of a spreadsheet kept beside them.
05
Vendor bills and taxes
Vendor bills and aged payable sit inside finance, and tax is configured once and applied by the engine on every document that needs it.
06
Reports that tie to the ledger
Overview, balance sheet, cash flow, and aging read posted entries directly. There is no export step standing between the books and the report.
Specifications
Engineered to a standard, not a slogan.
Engines
Deterministic finance engine
Totals, tax, document numbering, and journal lines are calculated by the engine. The assistant requests the action; it does not compute the amount.
Data model
One workspace record set
Customers, catalog items, prices, taxes, and journals live in the same workspace-isolated schema every other module reads.
Permissions
Role, modules, and user grants
Every finance action passes the same authorization the product interface enforces, checked before the transaction opens.
Assistant access
Same authority as the user
If the signed in user cannot issue an invoice or post a journal, the assistant cannot do it on their behalf.
Audit
Recorded under the acting user
Created invoices, applied payments, and posted entries are written to the activity log against the identity that performed them.
API & MCP
One shared action layer
A button click, an assistant tool call, an API request, and an MCP call reach the same guarded server action.
Frequently Asked Questions · Finance & Invoicing
What teams ask about Finance & Invoicing
before they move their operations.
No. The assistant drafts and prepares, but the send action is presented for confirmation before anything leaves the workspace. Ask it to invoice Acme Corp for the implementation package and it resolves the real record first: the customer, the catalog item, the stored price, the workspace currency, the tax treatment, the payment terms, and the recipient. Then the finance engine validates the request, calculates totals and tax, allocates the next number in sequence — INV-2026-0417, not a number the model invented — creates the invoice, and commits the journal. Only then does the assistant present the send action for you to confirm. If something is missing, it asks rather than guessing. Delivery and activity are recorded on the invoice afterward, under your identity, so the audit trail shows who authorized the send and when it happened.
The finance engine calculates. The model can select an action; it never computes the money. Totals, tax, rounding, invoice numbering, and the journal entries behind a document are produced deterministically from the stored price, the workspace currency, and the tax configuration on the record. That means the same invoice built through the product interface, through the assistant, through the API, or through MCP produces identical figures, because all four routes reach the same guarded business logic in one shared action layer. Payments, expenses, income, vendor bills, bank records, and tax reports run through that same engine, so period-end reports are built from posted transactions rather than a summary a model wrote. If a request would produce an invalid document, validation rejects it before anything posts, and the assistant reports the reason instead of routing around it.
No. The assistant runs as you: same role, same module access, same user grants, same model permissions, same workspace. If your account cannot approve a vendor bill or post to a locked period, asking the assistant changes nothing — the request is refused at the access stage, before any data is resolved. Every prompt follows one path: prompt, identity, access, resolve data, engine, action, audit. The model chooses which action to attempt. Agaro decides whether and how it executes. Finance is where that boundary matters most, so the assistant is deliberately not a privileged service account with keys of its own; it holds no authority except yours. A finance clerk in the Acme Industries workspace sees a smaller set of actions than the owner does, and their assistant sees exactly the same smaller set.
The same audit history a button click produces. Every action — draft, edit, post, send, payment applied, credit issued — is written with the signed in actor, the workspace, the record it touched, and the time. Because the assistant executes through the same product server action a person uses, there is no separate AI log to reconcile against the finance log. There is one trail. An invoice created by prompt and an invoice created by hand look identical in the record's activity history, differing only in what the entry says was done. Journals commit inside the same transaction as the document, so you never end up with an invoice that posted and a journal that did not. Data and audit history live in workspace isolated PostgreSQL, so one workspace's finance activity is never visible from another.
Agaro ERP is an AI native ERP from Agaro Technologies LLC, built so the software can do the work rather than only record it. It covers finance and invoicing, HR and payroll, CRM and leads, marketing, inventory and supply chain, manufacturing, projects and tasks, an app and website builder, a module builder, agency mode, and the AGARO Assistant — one connected workspace instead of a stack of tools that have to agree with each other. ERP has always held the facts: the customer, the price, the hours, the contract, the approvals. Someone still had to find the records, calculate the result, push the buttons, and reconcile what happened. Agaro closes that gap by giving the assistant the same authority the prompting user has and keeping deterministic engines in charge of money, pay, and stock. It is launching soon.
It does not decide; your access does. The prompting user is the identity and their workspace is the data boundary, and the assistant inherits all of it: same role, same module access, same user grants, same model permissions, same workspace. If the user cannot perform an action, the assistant cannot perform it. Every prompt follows one path — prompt, identity, access, resolve data, engine, action, audit — and access is checked before any record is read, so a request outside your permissions stops before data is resolved rather than being declined politely after the fact. The model's role is narrow by design: it selects an action, and Agaro decides whether and how that action executes. Anything that commits or delivers is presented for confirmation, and everything that happens is recorded under your identity in your workspace's audit history.
It means no route from a model to your data skips the business logic. The product interface, the AI assistant, the API, and MCP all resolve to a signed in actor with a workspace, role, modules, and model permissions, then pass through one shared action layer where input validation, authorization, the transaction, and the activity log happen. Only then do the finance, payroll, inventory, CRM, and workflow engines run, against workspace isolated PostgreSQL data and audit history. A button click and an assistant tool call reach the same guarded business logic. Practically, that is why the model never calculates an invoice total, a payroll register, or a stock quantity: the engines do, deterministically, and the same request produces the same result whichever route it arrived on. Same identity, same controls, same business actions, one audit trail.
Agaro ERP is launching soon. We are not publishing a date, because the parts that have to be right — the finance and payroll engines, the single stock-write path, the permission model binding the assistant to the user — are the parts worth finishing properly rather than shipping to a calendar. Early access is by talking to us. Tell us what you run today, which modules matter first, and whether you operate one business or a portfolio of client businesses through agency mode, and we will tell you plainly whether Agaro fits and when. If it does not fit yet, we would rather say so than take the signup. You can sign up on agaro.ai to be told when it opens, or reach Agaro Technologies LLC directly at info@agaro.ai or +1 (571) 278-8979. The company is based in Brambleton, Virginia.
The AGARO Assistant can do anything the prompting user can do. It is not a search box or a summarizer bolted onto a report screen — it creates and updates records, runs workflows, and completes transactions inside the ERP. Ask it to invoice a customer and it resolves the real customer, the catalog item, the stored price, the workspace currency, tax, and payment terms, then calls the finance engine to validate the request, calculate totals, allocate the invoice number, create the invoice, and commit the journal. It can create and assign tasks, move projects, prepare a payroll run, raise a purchase, or record a stock movement, each through the same server action a person triggers by clicking. When something is missing it asks. When an action needs confirmation, such as sending a document to a customer, it presents that action and waits for you.
By the prompting user. The signed in user is the identity and their workspace is the data boundary, so the assistant inherits the same role, the same module access, the same user grants, the same model permissions, and the same workspace. If the user cannot perform an action, the assistant cannot perform it. There is no service account with elevated rights sitting behind the chat window and no side channel into the database. Every prompt follows one controlled path: prompt, identity, access, resolve data, engine, action, audit. Access is evaluated before any record is read, engines validate and calculate before anything is written, and the outcome is recorded under the user who asked, not under the model. The model selects an action; the ERP decides whether and how that action executes. The audit history reads the same whether the work was done by clicking or by prompting.
Get early access to Finance & Invoicing
Agaro ERP is launching soon. Tell us how you run this part of the business today and we will show you how the assistant runs it inside Agaro.
Talk to us